Blog
A recent article from LittleLaw revealed that a software company has acquired a UK law firm — a sign of how rapidly technology is reshaping the legal industry.And for many businesses, that change cannot come fast enough.Over the past decade, companies across multiple sectors have faced an explosion in class actions, group claims, and mass litigation. From data privacy cases to consumer claims, businesses are increasingly forced into expensive legal battles that can last years and cost millions — even where the underlying harm to individuals is minimal.Critics argue the system has created a growing litigation industry where law firms, funders, and claims companies profit from large-scale disputes while businesses absorb mounting legal costs, reputational damage, and operational disruption.That is where legal technology enters the picture.
Read More →Blog
For too long, parts of the claims management industry have operated behind the language of “consumer support” while relying on confusion, pressure-selling and excessive fees.Now, the Financial Conduct Authority is finally confronting those practices publicly — and it is long overdue.The FCA’s latest review into the sector highlights concerns around misleading advertising, unfair fees and consumers allegedly being signed up without proper consent.That is not a minor compliance issue.It is a serious trust problem.
Read More →Blog
A recent judicial rebuke aimed at Pogust Goodhead should concern anyone who believes modern class actions are primarily about justice.According to Legal Futures, Mr Justice Bright criticised the firm for bringing claims on behalf of Brazilian claimants without proper authority, stating the case “should never have been commenced in the first place.”That is not a technical error. It is a serious failure that exposes wider problems within the class action industry.Large claimant firms increasingly operate like litigation businesses driven by funding, marketing, and claimant recruitment on an industrial scale. The pressure to sign up thousands of claimants and launch high-profile proceedings can overwhelm basic legal safeguards.
Read More →Blog
The litigation funding industry is “deeply disappointed” that the Government failed to include a PACCAR fix in the King’s Speech. Frankly, that may be the most encouraging legal development of the year.For months, ministers, the Civil Justice Council and claimant lawyers have insisted there is an “urgent” need to reverse the Supreme Court’s PACCAR ruling. Funders warn of uncertainty. They claim consumers are being denied “access to justice”. They demand immediate legislation.But the Government’s refusal to rush through a legislative bailout could prove to be an overdue moment of restraint.The PACCAR judgment exposed a reality the class actions industry would rather avoid discussing — modern litigation funding is no longer a niche mechanism helping impecunious claimants. It is now a multi-billion-pound investment model built around taking a cut of damages awards.
Read More →Blog
The Post Office’s decision to sign a £2.4 million crisis PR contract while continuing to fight legal claims from Horizon scandal victims raises serious questions about priorities. (Sky News)At a time when many former sub-postmasters are still waiting for full compensation, public funds are apparently being directed toward reputation management rather than resolving victims’ claims quickly and fairly. This matters because the Horizon scandal is not a conventional corporate dispute. It is one of the worst miscarriages of justice in modern British history. Hundreds of people were prosecuted, financially ruined and publicly disgraced because of failures the Post Office now accepts should never have happened. Against that backdrop, spending millions on PR advisers looks profoundly tone deaf.
Read More →Blog
A collective claim over alleged price-fixing in the salmon industry is being framed as a win for consumers. But as reported by The Observer, the case could generate substantial legal fees for claimant lawyers and litigation funders, raising familiar questions about who really benefits from these actions.At its core, the claim alleges that major producers coordinated prices, inflating costs across the supply chain. If proven, that is clearly serious. The bigger issue, however, lies in how these cases are structured and monetised.UK class actions have expanded quickly in recent years, particularly through the Competition Appeal Tribunal, and this growth has been accompanied by a well-funded ecosystem of claimant firms and third-party funders. The financial model is straightforward - large pooled claims create leverage, legal costs can escalate rapidly, and defendants face strong incentives to settle early. In many cases, the returns for lawyers and funders are significant regardless of how much ultimately reaches the consumers involved.
Read More →
Independent information platform on class action risks, litigation funding structures, and claimant awareness.