Blog
Consumer Voice has criticised Rachel Reeves' proposed financial services reforms, warning they could weaken compensation protections and reduce the number of complaints reaching the Financial Ombudsman Service. But fewer complaints do not automatically mean weaker consumer protection. For too long, Britain's compensation culture has been driven by claims firms, litigation funders and campaign groups that measure success by the volume of cases rather than the quality of outcomes. A system flooded with technical complaints and procedural disputes benefits lawyers and claims companies far more than ordinary consumers.
Read More →Blog
For years, Britain's class action industry has thrived on a simple formula – launch a headline-grabbing claim, secure litigation funding, recruit claimants and pile pressure on defendants to settle. A recent High Court costs ruling arising from a £1 billion group action suggests that approach is finally facing judicial resistance. The court's criticism of the claimants' "cavalier" conduct sends a clear message – collective litigation is not a risk-free commercial exercise. Firms that pursue vast claims without proper preparation, case management or evidential foundations should expect consequences.
Read More →Blog
The litigation funding industry likes to present itself as the engine of “access to justice”. But the collapse of another major funder tells a different story. According to reports, administrators are now investigating transfers made before the company entered administration, including dealings involving a former subsidiary. For consumers signed up to funded group claims, the episode raises an obvious question – what happens when the people financing the litigation run out of money themselves?
Read More →Blog
The UK's class action industry has spent years portraying itself as a noble crusade against corporate wrongdoing. But behind the glossy marketing, celebrity endorsements and billion-pound claims, an increasingly familiar picture is emerging – financial disputes, governance concerns and mounting questions about who really benefits from this litigation boom. The latest development comes from claimant law firm Pogust Goodhead, one of the most prominent names in Britain's rapidly expanding group litigation sector. According to reports in the Law Society Gazette, the firm has been ordered to face a claim for £2.2 million in allegedly unpaid legal fees brought by another law firm. A court rejected efforts to strike out the claim, meaning the dispute will now proceed through the courts.
Read More →Blog
The UK may be edging closer to a major expansion of collective litigation. The Law Commission is considering whether England and Wales should introduce a broader consumer class action regime beyond competition law — potentially allowing mass claims across sectors including insurance, banking, telecoms and retail. Supporters describe the move as improving “access to justice”. Critics see something else – the creation of a much larger litigation industry.
Read More →Blog
US law firms are no longer “challengers” in the UK disputes market — they are rapidly becoming its defining force. New data showing American firms now involved in one in five Commercial Court cases confirms what many corporate defendants already fear — the UK litigation market is becoming more aggressive, more expensive and more trial-driven. For businesses, this is not necessarily good news. The traditional UK litigation culture historically rewarded proportionality, settlement and commercial pragmatism. The arrival of heavily capitalised US firms — armed with eye-watering partner pay, aggressive lateral hiring and a distinctly American appetite for courtroom warfare — risks importing a litigation culture that thrives on escalation rather than resolution.
Read More →
Independent information platform on class action risks, litigation funding structures, and claimant awareness.